logo

MRN For the Dx of Piriformis Syndrome?

HOME

Weber: Discectomy v. Conservative Care?

Nykvist: Hospitalized for HNP?

Maine Study: Surgery v. Conservative Care

MRI False-Positive Rates for HNP?

Saal: ESIs for Radiculopathy

Padua: Laminectomy v. Instability v. Outcomes

Komori:HNP Type vs. Outcomes?

Postacchini: Discectomy 101

Carragee: annular tear v. Surgery outcomes

Hough: Discectomy Fail Rates

Ohnmeiss: Sciatica From Disc Tears?

Kuslich: Tissue Origin of Sciatica?

Rothoerl: When Is It Time for Discectomy?

Freemont: Can the Disc Get Wired for Pain?

Milette: Can Annular Tears Cause Sciatica?

Schwarzer: What's the Prevalence of IDD?

Klein: Intradiscal Injections for LBP?

Davis: The Efficacy of IDET

Karppinen: HNP Size v. Symptoms

Duggal: ALIF for the Treatment of FBSS?

Yeung: Endoscopic Discectomy

Yeung: SED for the treatment of IDD

Torgerson: Can X-Ray Predict Low Back Pain?

Ruetten: ACDF vs. EACD For Neck and Arm Pain

Lewis: MRN for DX piriformis syndrome?

Hirsh: Automated Pre-Cutaneous Discectomy

Upadhyaya: ACDF v. Cervical Artificial Discs

Yao: Endoscopic ACDF – Five-Year Results

Singh: Lumbar Laser Discectomy

Giesecke: LBP from Central Sensitization

Peng: Fusion for the TX of Discogenic Sciatica

Gerges: Nucleoplasty for LBP & Leg Pain?

IDET and PIRFT

Kapural: Biacuplasty for Discogenic pain?

Albert: Antibiotics for Back & Leg Pain?

Chemonucleolysis via DiscoGel?

Santilli: Chiro Care for Disc Protrusion?

Carragee: Discography Hurts the Disc?

Herzog: Radiology Report Accuracy?

DISCLAIMER

Introduction | The Study | Results | My Conclusion

Lewis AM, Layzer R, et al. “Magnetic Resonance Neurography in Extraspinal Sciatica” Arch Neurol. 2006;63:1469-1472

When it comes to low back pain with associated radiating lower limb pain (sciatica), lumbar disc herniation and/or stenosis are the usual suspects with regard to causation. However, the clinical picture gets more complicated when the former and latter are not present on imaging, yet the patient suffers debilitating sciatica. What could be the cause?

Besides other possible nonpathological causes (like discogenic referred pain or instability from a spondylolysis), abnormality within the piriformis and/or gemellus musculature have been proposed as a possible cause of the relatively rare extraspinal sciatica. More specifically, since the sciatic nerve passes between the piriformis and gemellus musculature, it has been speculated that hypertrophy in those muscles (as well as involvement of a adjacent fibrous band of connective tissue ) may compress the sciatic nerve in the pelvis, which in turn results in the patient's sciatica.

The diagnosis, however, is not easy to make. This is because the sensitivity and specificity of examination and orthopedic findings is quite low for the condition. (In other words, doctors can't really tell if you have it or not from their exam). Furthermore, MRIs sensitivity and specificity is also not very good. The good news, is that we have a new tool which ostensibly boasts a higher sensitivity and specificity for making the diagnosis!

In 2006, Kaiser’s Lewis et al, published the results of their retrospective investigation into the diagnostic value of MR neurography for making the diagnosis of extraspinal sciatica – i.e. piriformis syndrome.

The Study:

The cohort (group of patients) was created from a retrospective (done after the fact) review of medical records of 14 patients that suffered unexplained unilateral sciatica – i.e., these patients had no disc herniation, stenosis or any other obvious cause of the sciatica. All of these patients had previously undergone MR neurography as part of a further diagnostic workup. The subsequent images from MR neurography were interpreted by one of the researchers, all of whom specialized in reading MR neurograms.

Results

Unfortunately, this was not a well written paper and interpreting the results was challenging to say the least. The authors reported that in 12 of patients (86%), MR neurography demonstrated signs of inflammation and other pathological change within the sciatic nerve.

With regard to the portion of the sciatic nerve adjacent to the piriformis muscle, only 8 of them (57%) had signs of inflammation.

Study Confounders

There were plenty of things that damaged this study. Let's take a look at them.

  1. the MR neurography in one patient (7%) demonstrated inflammation in the sciatic nerve on both sides: the sciatic-affected leg, as well as the normal leg.
  2. another patient had a completely normal MR neurography, yet he had unexplained sciatica. To make things more confounding, this patient ultimately underwent a successful piriformis release-- the patient's sciatica got better from releasing the sciatic nerve from entrapment within the piriformis muscle (so MR neurography completely missed the boat here).
  3. another patient had positive MR neurography on the ipsilateral side, but the inflammation in the sciatic nerve was not at the level of the piriformis muscle – it was all the way down at the level of the ischial tuberosity (far away from the piriformis muscle).s
  4. the study was way underpowered! We need at least 50 patients in order for the study to be worth anything.

More Results

Conclusion/Comments

This was a very small retrospective study aimed at looking inside the sciatic nerve in patients with unexplained sciatica. Of the 14 patients, 12 (86%) had focal inflammation within the ipsilateral sciatic nerve. Only 8 of the 14 (57%) showed signs of piriformis syndrome as confirmed by MR neurography. 

There were forming confounders in this tiny study that really suggests MRN is not a useful test for making the diagnosis of piriformis syndrome. (See above)

Obviously, a much larger study needs to be done to determine with regard to the usefulness of MRN for the diagnosis of piriformis syndrome.